Some time ago I read a biography of
Isobel Kuhn entitled “By Searching.”
Isobel (1901-1957) was a missionary to the Lisu people of Yunnan Province, China, and northern Thailand. She served with
the China
Inland Mission, along with her husband, John. The following excerpt from her book tells of
her experience of being interviewed as a prospective missionary by the council
of China Inland Mission. She was taken
aback by the response of one of the council members, and was, at first, quite
defensive. But the council of a fellow
believer led her to reconsider, and even though wrongly accused, God led her to
respond in a more positive way which ultimately contributed to her preparation
for ministry. Her experience speaks to
the truth of 1 Peter 2:18-20, “Servants, be submissive to your masters with all
respect, not only to those who are good and gentle, but also to those who are
unreasonable. For this finds favor, if
for the sake of conscience toward God a man bears up sorrows when suffering
unjustly. For what credit is there if,
when you sin and harshly treated, you endure it with patience? But if when you do what is right and suffer
for it you patiently endure it, this finds favor with God.”
“I was in Toronto some
three or four weeks before being called to meet the Council. That is a
formidable occasion and I was nervous, as I am not quick at thinking on my
feet. I always do better with preparation and time to consider the best answer.
The meeting came and went, however, and that evening after supper I was called
into the sitting-room by Mr. Brownlee to hear the verdict. He said something
like this: "The Council was quite satisfied with your answers today, and
we in the Home have enjoyed your presence. But the Council has asked me to
speak to you upon a very serious matter. Among your referees there was one who
did not recommend you. The reason given
was that you are proud, disobedient, and likely to be a troublemaker. This
person has known you for some years, and the Council felt they could not ignore
the criticism."
"Who was it?" I asked
quickly, simply dumbfounded.
"The C.I.M. does not betray the
confidence of referees. We write to those who have had business associations
with you as well as the referees you yourself give—and we promise to keep all
reports in confidence. I cannot tell you the name, but I would like to discuss
with you what havoc such characteristics can cause on the field."
He then proceeded to do so. At the end
of an hour of earnest exhortation, he pronounced the verdict: "The Council
decided to accept you conditionally. There is an anti-foreign uprising in China
just now which is very serious and we dare not send out any new candidates.
That will be our public statement on this matter. For yourself alone, and we
hope you will not spread it around, during your waiting period the Vancouver
Council will be watching to see if any of these characteristics show
themselves. If you prove that you have conquered them, you will then meet with
the Western Council and be accepted fully, and sent out with the first party
that goes. As we anticipate your victory in these matters, it was voted to pay
your train fare to Vancouver, as en
route for China. I can assure
you I have not found it easy to say these things." And indeed his face was
sad and tired. I felt sorry for him, even with the misery that was numbing my
own heart.
"Good night." And I went up
to bed, but, as you can readily believe, not to sleep. Who could be the unknown
referee?
Proud. Disobedient. A troublemaker. This
was the third time the adjective proud had been attached to me. The first
time was by Daddy Page himself months before. He had read me an anxious lecture
on the subject, to my extreme surprise, for pride was one of the human
frailties of which I felt I was not guilty. I would have taken Daddy Page's
lecture to heart if he had not ended it by holding up to me, as one example to
emulate, a certain fellow-student. That particular student stood high in the
regard of the staff, but I happened to room near her and I knew that secretly
she broke many Institute rules, also she lied about her age to her boyfriends,
and so on. I was sure if Dr. Page knew what I knew, he would never have held
her up as a pattern of conduct. So I concluded he did not know either of us and
brushed the accusation aside. China was later to be a painful revelation to me
of my own heart and frailty. From this distance I now know that Dr. Page had
indeed sensed a real flaw in my life but had hold of the wrong label, that was
all.
I was selfish. I had whimsically
divided the world into two classes—people who interested me and people who did
not. I felt I was not proud, because the people who interested me were often
among the poor or the uneducated, but when it was so, my friendship for them
was still as warm as for those who had social or educational advantages.
Toward people who did not interest me
I must have appeared proud. I cold-shouldered them and brushed them off me as
time-wasters. This was of course a serious flaw for a missionary, but I fancy
its basis was selfishness rather than pride.
The next point was—disobedience. How I
did get indignant! There were many rules at Moody Bible Institute which were
difficult to keep. The rules have been revised since, and it is no longer so,
but I had been meticulous in obeying simply because I had signed a promise to
do so. I felt honor-bound to keep that promise. The little matter of laundry,
for instance: we had washbowls in our rooms, but their use for laundry was
forbidden. To rinse one pair of stockings a day was allowed, no more. There was
no laundry in Ransom Hall, so I had to waste many weary steps going to another
dormitory to do my laundry and waste more precious minutes because it was
required that each time I get permission from the Matron to do so. And I could
not always find the Matron. This was my most galling trial. The girl who had
been held up to me as an example washed all her lingerie and sometimes even
nightclothes right in her bedroom at hours when she knew the inspectors would
be busy elsewhere, and dried them on her radiator! "The rule is
unreasonable" was her only answer when I remarked on it. But I had
promised to obey, so I dragged my weary self over to the other building every week.
And now the C.I.M. had been told I was disobedient!
I had been told not to spread around
this second condition of my acceptance by the Mission, but I did write a few
friends. They wrote back quickly, indignant and sympathetic, and I was somewhat
mollified. All except one, Roy Bancroft, a music student with a beautiful
baritone voice and a consecrated heart. We had invited Roy out to St. Charles
Reformatory to sing to the boys and help deal with them. I happened to be
writing to him those days and impulsively told him. A letter came back quickly
and I opened it with a smile of anticipation, thinking that Roy too would be
indignant on my behalf.
But I got a shock.
"Isobel," he wrote,
"what surprised me most of all was your attitude in this matter. You sound
bitter and resentful. Why, if anyone had said to me, 'Roy B., you are proud,
disobedient, and a troublemaker,' I would answer: 'Amen, brother! And even then
you haven't said the half of it!' What good thing is there in any of us,
anyway? We have victory over these things only as we bring them one by one to
the Cross and ask our Lord to crucify it for us."
These words "stabbed my spirit
broad awake." Faithful friend he was, not afraid to season his words with
salt even as he did not forget to speak with grace also. I was on my knees in
no time asking the Lord to forgive me.
I arose from my knees with a different
attitude. Instead of resentment there was alertness to watch and see if these
three horrid "Diabolutians"—pride, disobedience, rebellion—were
really lurking in my camp. The town of Mansoul should not protect them, if
detected. This brought me into peace, even though I always shrank from the
memory that I was to be watched for their appearance in my life.
Subsequently it so happened that in a
most unexpected way I learned of my detractor's identity and then I knew the
reason for her hostility. It will suffice here to say that she was a teacher in
a school which I had attended. She wished me to assist her in spying on my
fellow-pupils. I felt that was unworthy and so had incurred her displeasure by
refusing. When I learned this I was tempted to clear myself with Mr. Brownlee
and the Western Council. But should I? I seemed to hear a voice say, "If
that had been said of me, I'd have answered 'Amen, Brother! And then you
haven't told the half of it!'" Dear old Roy—he was right. Why try to make
the Mission think I was lily-white? They'd have personal experience before long
as to just how earthly a person I was!”
