Monday, November 20, 2017
JESUS GAVE THANKS
Thursday, July 27, 2017
PRAYER IS FOR THE NEEDY
Tuesday, June 28, 2016
A TIME TO PRAY
Thursday, February 4, 2016
THE START OF SCHOOL
Wednesday, November 11, 2015
Thursday, July 30, 2015
ONE CONTRARY VOICE
What do you do if you, as a Christian, are called upon by
governing authorities to do something that is in violation of your
conscience? What used to be a
theoretical question about something foreign to our experience--reserved for
Bible School debate or Sunday School discussions--is increasingly becoming a
distinct possibility or reality for the Bible-believing Christian in America.
Believers are to submit themselves to the governing
authorities. That is the clear teaching
of Scripture (Cf. Romans 13:1-7; 1 Peter 2:13-14). But when asked to do something that is
clearly immoral or unethical, the Christian has no choice but to reluctantly
refuse and obey God rather than man (Cf. Daniel 6:1-10; Acts 4:18-20). Church history is filled with examples of
people who chose to do so, in spite of whatever opposition and threats they
faced. I recently came across one such
example. Here’s the story…
It was later deemed the Aktion T4 program. The name T4 was an abbreviation of the
address of a villa in Berlin which was the headquarters of the “Charitable
Foundation for Curative and Institutional Care." But there was nothing charitable or curative
about the program. The program was borne
of a “trial” case in which a family petitioned the Nazi government to put their
blind and disabled son to death. The boy
was evaluated by Hitler’s personal physician, Karl Brandt, and was killed in
July of 1939. Hitler then instructed
Brandt to proceed in a similar manner in similar cases. Three weeks after the boy’s death, The Reich
Committee for the Scientific Registering of Hereditary and Congenital Illnesses
was established. Secret killing of
infants began in 1939 and increased after the war started. From August 1939, the committee began
registering children with disabilities, requiring doctors and midwives to
report all cases of newborns with severe cases.
Those identified or suspected to have serious hereditary diseases,
malformations, or disabilities were to be killed. Tens of thousands of children were eventually
murdered under the program, and for a while, the government hid it from the
public.
Lest we suppose this kind of thing to be a moral anomaly,
impossible in our day, consider the views of Bioethicist Peter Singer (A
Princeton professor, abortion advocate, and animal rights activist). In a radio interview on April 16th,
he argued that it would be “reasonable” in some circumstances for the
government and private health insurance companies to deny treatment – even
life-saving treatment – for infants with disabilities. He’s not the only one that thinks that
way. The founder of the American Birth
Control League (which later became the Planned Parenthood Federation of
America), Margaret Sanger, held similar eugenic views. On average, nearly 3000 babies are
murdered in abortion each day and in some cases for the cause of “fetal
abnormalities.” In the decades since
Roe v. Wade, babies have been euthanized in America in numbers that far exceed
those that occurred under the Nazi regime (~55 million babies have been killed in
the “American holocaust”). Horrifically,
a recent undercover investigation unveiled evidence that Planned Parenthood has
even been engaged in the practice of harvesting and selling body parts from
aborted babies.
It proved to be impossible to keep the Aktion T4 program
secret from the German public. Thousands
of doctors, nurses, and administrators were involved. Most of the children who were killed had
families who were concerned about them.
In some cases, families could discern that the causes of death in
certificates were false. They sought out
the truth. Eventually, some of the staff
at the killing centers started talking.
In the towns where the centers were located, people saw the smoke from
the crematoria chimneys. In a town
called Hadamar, ashes containing human hair rained down on the town.
Lothar Kreyssig was the one Judge in all of Germany who
spoke out. Lothar was born in Saxony,
the son of a businessman. After serving
in WWI, he gained his law degree and eventually a judgeship in Chemnitz,
Germany. Though pressured to join the
Nazi party, he refused, citing the need to maintain his judicial
independence. In 1934, he joined the
Confessing Church, the church to which Dietrich Bonhoeffer also belonged.
Before we can proceed with the rest of Lothar’s story, we
need to explain how the Confessing Church came into existence. More than anything else, it was borne out of
protest to what was called “the Aryan Paragraph.” The paragraph first appeared in the Third
Reich in 1933 in a law which stipulated that only those of Aryan descent could
be employed in civil service (thus excluding all Jews). It was later broadened to exclude those
married to a “non-Aryan.” The Nazi party
pressured other organizations to adopt the paragraph. And most did.
Jews were thus barred from the public health system, lost their public
offices, were driven from editorial offices and theaters, and were excluded
from agriculture. They would eventually
face more horrific things.
In the beginning, the objections of the Confessing Church to
the Nazi regime were not motivated by moral outrage over antisemitism. What they didn’t like was the regime’s
interference in their affairs. The
controversy was ultimately over the autonomy of the church. In May 1934, the members of the Confessing Church met in a synod
in Barmen. The pastors denounced the
leadership of the government sponsored church and declared that they and their
congregations constituted the true Evangelical Church of Germany. The Barmen Declaration re-affirmed that the
German Church was not an "organ of the State" and that the concept of
State control over the Church was doctrinally false. The Declaration stipulated, at its core, that
any State—even the totalitarian one— necessarily encountered a limit when
confronted with God's commandments. After
the Barmen Declaration, there were in effect two Protestant churches in
Germany: the officially sanctioned Church and the Confessing Church. The Confessing Church did not offer
resistance, in the political sense, with the intent of bringing down the Nazi
regime. It fought instead to keep its own
autonomy and to preserve the independence of church doctrine. Over time, they found themselves—in standing
for truth--increasingly in a state of principled opposition to both the state
and other German Christians.
Back to Lothar’s story.
He was transferred to a lower district court in 1937. His involvement in the Confessing Church
resulted in an investigation. Kreyssig’s
superiors considered him to be a good judge–until he began a series of minor
insubordinations such as slipping out of a ceremony in his court when a bust of
Hitler was unveiled and publicly protesting the suspension of three judges who
failed to follow the interpretation of “Aryan laws” favored by Nazi authorities. Though the regime took no specific actions
against him at that time, they undoubtedly henceforth kept him under close
scrutiny. One could imagine him to be
tempted to lay low to avoid drawing attention to himself, but that’s not what
he did. His work as a mental health
court guardianship judge made him responsible for several hundred mentally
retarded children and adults. After he
observed that the number of death certificates for his wards was increasing, he
began to suspect the deaths to be connected to the “mercy killings” that had
begun. He reported his suspicions in a
letter to Minister of Justice Franz Gurtner, writing, “What is right is what
benefits the people. In the name of this
frightful doctrine — as yet, uncontradicted by any guardian of rights in
Germany — entire sectors of communal living are excluded from having rights,
for example, all the concentration camps, and now, all hospitals and
sanatoriums.” He filed an injunction
against the institutions, prohibiting them from transferring wards without his
consent.
Four months later, Lothar was summoned by Gurtner, who laid
before him Hitler’s personal letter that started the euthanasia program and
which constituted the sole legal basis for it.
Kreyssig replied, "The Führer's word does not create a right,"
clearly signifying that he did not recognize this as a legal right. Gurtner then told Kreyssig, "If you cannot
recognize the will of the Führer as a source of law, then you cannot remain a
judge.” In December 1940, Kreyssig was suspended. Efforts by the Gestapo to send him to a
concentration camp failed. Two years
later, in March 1942, Hitler forced Kreyssig to retire.
Public awareness and opposition to the T4 program grew and
on 24 August 1941, Hitler ordered its cancellation. Unfortunately, the winding-up of the T4
program did not actually put an end to the killing of people with disabilities. Many more died after the program was
officially terminated.
In his book, “Hitler’s Justice: The Courts of the Third
Reich”, Ingo Muller writes of the courageous judge: “No matter how hard one
searches for stout-hearted men among the judges of the Third Reich, for judges
who refused to serve the regime from the bench, there remains a grand total of
one: Dr. Lothar Kreyssig.”
Lothar Kreyssig was the only German judge who attempted to
stop the Aktion T4 euthanasia program. Not
only did he defy the Reich, he outlived it by forty one years. Twenty years after his death, Germany held a
memorial service honoring his bravery and compassion. There are now four cities in Germany that
have streets named after him. In another
city, there is a senior care center that bears his name. The Lothar Kreyssig Peace Prize has been
awarded every two years since 1999 by the Lothar Kreyssig Foundation in
Magdeburg.
Thankfully, defending the sanctity of life and overreach of
the government doesn’t now require anything of us like Kreyssig’s courage, but
the time may come when it will. There
are things that we can now do in confronting evil. We can pray, as one of our elders did in a
recent prayer meeting. With tears in his
eyes, he prayed for the mothers contemplating an abortion—that their hearts
might be turned so that they might value and preserve the life of their unborn
child. We can vote, for those who stand
on the side of truth and value the lives of the most innocent and vulnerable amongst
us. We can lend our support to the
ministries of pro-life groups and the pregnancy resource centers who work to
assist and inform mothers who are wondering about what to do regarding their
pregnancies. We can wholeheartedly
enjoin ourselves, in fellowship and service, to those churches who stand for
truth and speak the truth in love. We
can speak to others of the innocent One whose own life was terminated, in
bearing our sins, so that we might be forgiven and find eternal life in Him. As has been said, “The only thing necessary
for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.” Despite the threat to
his livelihood and life, Lothar chose to do something. And others were bettered for it. Amongst all of the judges in Germany, it was
his one contrary voice that worked to help “overcome evil with good” (Romans
12:21).